The governance gap in numbers: what the 2025 and 2026 surveys show
Six surveys from 2025 and 2026 measure family office governance. Investment committees are common, succession plans and risk processes are not. Data compared.
Key takeaways
J.P. Morgan's 2026 report: 86% of family offices lack a clear succession plan for key decision makers.
UBS's 2026 report: 60% have an investment committee but only 28% a risk process beyond investments.
Deloitte's 2024 cyber study: 43% of offices attacked in two years, 31% with no incident response plan.
The 2025 and 2026 surveys describe the same shape of governance gap from different angles: between half and two-thirds of family offices have an investment committee, roughly a third have a board or an investment policy statement, and well under half have a documented succession plan, a risk process that extends beyond the portfolio, or tested cyber controls. The investment function is governed; the office and the family are not. The table below lines up the comparable figures; samples, regions and question wording differ between reports.
The surveys
Six data sets carry most of the weight. UBS's Global Family Office Report 2026 surveyed 307 single family offices with average assets of $1.3bn between January and March 2026. J.P. Morgan's 2026 Global Family Office Report covered 333 single family offices in 30 countries, 59% of them in the United States, with average net worth of $1.6bn. Citi's 2025 Global Family Office Report drew 346 responses from 45 countries in June and July 2025, and its 2026 edition drew 351 from 41 countries. Bank of America's 2025 Family Office Study covered 335 North American offices. Deloitte's Family Office Cybersecurity Report 2024 and its Defining the Family Office Landscape 2024 (354 single family offices) remain the most detailed on cyber and board structure. RBC and Campden Wealth's 2026 North America Family Office Report covered 155 offices.
The comparison
Measure | Figure | Survey |
|---|---|---|
Investment committee in place | 64% | J.P. Morgan 2026 |
Investment committee in place | 60% | UBS 2026 |
Investment committee in place | 53% | Citi 2025 |
Formal investment policy statement | 35% | J.P. Morgan 2026 |
Formal investment policy statement | 45% | Citi 2025 |
Board of directors | 32% | J.P. Morgan 2026 |
No governing board | 36% | Citi 2025 |
Board of any kind | 73% | Deloitte 2024 |
Formal governance with board-level oversight | Fewer than half | UBS 2026 |
Any governance structure | 90% | Bank of America 2025 |
Succession plan for the family office | 35% | UBS 2026 |
Clear succession plan for key decision makers | 14% | J.P. Morgan 2026 |
No succession planning | 35% | Citi 2025 |
No succession plan | 23% | RBC and Campden 2026 |
Succession plan for family members | 53% | UBS 2025 |
Structured next-generation preparation | 27% | UBS 2026 |
Risk process beyond investments | 28% | UBS 2026 |
Cyber controls in place | About 40% | UBS 2026 |
Lack cyber controls | 31% | Citi 2025 |
Attacked in past 12 to 24 months | 43% | Deloitte 2024 |
No cyber incident response plan | 31% | Deloitte 2024 |
Formal financial performance measurement | 68% | UBS 2026 |
What the pattern shows
Three readings follow from the table.
The first is that the investment layer is built. Every survey puts the committee above 50%, and UBS's 2026 figure of 68% with formal performance measurement is consistent with that. Where the IPS figure is low, as in J.P. Morgan's 35%, it tends to reflect offices in which the principal is the committee, a design discussed in decision rights.
The second is that succession is the largest gap and the one that is least improved. J.P. Morgan's 2026 finding that 86% lack a clear plan for key decision makers sits alongside UBS's 35% with a plan for the office and Citi's 35% with none. UBS's Global Family Office Report 2025 found 53% with a plan for family members, and among those without one, 29% said the owners believed they had plenty of time. Citi's 2026 report found roughly a third of families expect a leadership transition within five years, which does not leave plenty of time.
The third is that operational risk is governed least. UBS's 28% with a risk process beyond investments, Citi's 31% without cyber controls and Deloitte's 31% without an incident response plan describe the same offices from three directions. RBC and Campden's 2026 report, as covered by Wealth Professional, found 59% of North American offices now rank cyber as their top near-term operational concern, up from 16% a year earlier, and 73% say investment reporting is too manual.
Why the surveys disagree
Differences between reports are mostly definitional. Deloitte's 73% with a board and J.P. Morgan's 32% cannot both describe the same structure; one counts advisory boards and informal groups and the other does not. Regional mix matters too: J.P. Morgan's sample is 59% US, UBS's is 30% European and 12% US, and Citi's is 41% North American. Governance adoption rises with assets and generations, so a sample weighted towards older, larger offices will report higher figures. Citi's 2025 data, reported by WealthBriefing, show 73% of offices above $500m have an investment governance framework against 61% of smaller ones, and J.P. Morgan's summary data show family constitutions at 37% of three-generation offices against 5% of first-generation ones. Readers should compare trends within a survey rather than levels between surveys.
Direction of travel
The 2026 data contain some movement. Campden and AlTi's early 2026 findings from 126 offices show 48% have begun formally defining the purpose of their wealth, up from 33% in 2025. Ocorian's 2026 report found two-thirds of respondents reporting an increased focus on governance. The investment and administrative layers are tightening. Whether succession and family governance follow is the question the 2027 surveys will answer, and the practical content of those layers is set out in what a governance framework contains.
Questions
What is the family office governance gap?
The difference between well-governed investment functions and weakly governed offices and families. Surveys from 2025 and 2026 show 53% to 64% of offices have an investment committee, but only 14% to 35% have a documented succession plan and 28% a risk process beyond the portfolio.
Why do governance surveys give different figures?
Definitions and samples differ. Deloitte counts any board (73%) while J.P. Morgan counts formal boards of directors (32%). Regional mix, office size and generational depth all shift results, so trends within one survey are more reliable than comparisons between surveys.
Is family office governance improving?
Slowly, and unevenly. Campden and AlTi's 2026 early findings show 48% of offices formally defining the purpose of their wealth, up from 33% in 2025. Investment committee and budgeting adoption are rising. Succession planning figures have not moved materially across the 2025 and 2026 reports.
Sources
Global Family Office Report 2026, UBS, 2026
2026 Global Family Office Report, J.P. Morgan Private Bank, 2026
JP Morgan Private Bank Global Family Office Report 2026 (summary), Caproasia, 2026
2025 Global Family Office Report, Citi Private Bank, 2025
Citi Wealth 2026 Global Family Office Report (press release), Citi, 2026
2025 Family Office Study, Bank of America Private Bank, 2025
Family Office Cybersecurity Report 2024, Deloitte Private, 2024
Defining the Family Office Landscape 2024, Deloitte Private, 2024
The North America Family Office Report 2026, RBC Wealth Management and Campden Wealth, 2026
Global Family Office Report 2025, UBS, 2025
Half of family offices lack a complete succession plan, Wealth Professional (RBC and Campden Wealth 2026 North America Family Office Report), 2026
Citi 2025 report: governance frameworks by office size, WealthBriefing, 2026
2026 Family Office Operational Excellence Report: early findings, AlTi Tiedemann Global and Campden Wealth, 2026
Harnessing data, AI and reporting for strategic decision-making (Global Family Office Report 2026), Ocorian, 2026